Fredrick Douglass Essay -- essays research papers

After reading the Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass, An American Slave, I have received a better understanding of the life of a slave. Douglass has a way of explaining the trials and tribulations of a slave, which makes the reader, look at the situations in a different perspective. Douglass' narrative was originally oral and he eventually sat down and wrote it as story of events of that time during his life. I believe he wrote it not just to tell his story but for other abolitionists of the time to actually feel what the slaves went through.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Douglass begins his narrative in a very original way. He does not jump into the accounts of his life. But he begins very passive and describes the overseers in a detailed manner. He compares one of his slave masters, Mr. Covey, to a horse breaker. A horse breaker trains horses to be obedient and this is exactly what Mr. Covey does, he trains slaves in a similar way.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The audience Douglass is trying to appeal to are the other abolitionists who he wants to convince that these masters were wrong for their treatment of other human beings. The other abolitionists consist mainly of white, middle-class individuals, usually women. They were the most literate people of the time, therefore they could read this story and understand where Douglass was coming from. He did not go into gruesome details because the women of that time could not handle the gory descriptions of the beatin...

Emotionally Focused Therapy Essay

To love and be loved in return is essential for an individual’s happiness. In accordance with many other aspects of life, marital status as been linked to influencing ones life in a positive way; making it happier (Stack, Eshleman, 527). The problem with this is that not all marriages stay healthy and good. With divorce rates raging from 40%-50% in the United States, there ends up being a gap in the happiness of many (Marriage and Divorce, 1). One path that some pairs choose is couples therapy. Unfortunately, generalized couples therapy can be tricky in the way that there is not enough empirical data and it proves difficult for a therapist to know what to do, when to do it, or how to do it properly. As Greenman and Johnson point out, â€Å"Research done in the past 30 years would suggest that between 25%-30% of couples who receive therapy do not demonstrate significant improvement and that there are substantial rates of relapse (close to 40%) among those who do† (Greenman, Johnson, 46). This being said, they continue on to talk about an exception to this rule. It is an experiential-humanistic, systemic intervention that has plenty of empirical support and linked evidence between client outcome and the therapy process. This intervention is called Emotionally-Focused Therapy (EFT). To introduce this type of therapy is it important to know about Attachment Theory. This theory was developed in great part by a British psychiatrist named John Bowlby in the 1950’s (Peterson, 258). This theory has since been studied vigorously using the Strange Situation technique, which measures infant-parent attachment. It will observe infants reactions to their mothers leaving, and also to their return. What has been found is that children at a very young age develop one of three possible attachment styles. The first of the possibilities is to become securely attached. This is the case for around 70% of children (Peterson, 258). When the mother leaves the room, the infants will become upset, but upon her return the infant will reach out in  some positive way including smiling, touching, or speaking to the mother. The second outcome is known as Avoidant (about 20%) (Peterson, 258). In this case, the child will not become upset when the mother leaves, or will the child show enthusiasm when the mother returns. The third possibility is called Ambivalent (about 20%) (Peterson, 258). These children will cry when their mother leaves, and will not be comforted when she returns. In some cases, the child will actually punish the mother for leaving in the first place. These different outcomes have been linked directly to how a mother interacts with her infant. If the mother is affectionate and caring, the children will often develop secure attachments. On the other hand, if the mother is rejecting and judgmental, this could result in the child being ambivalent or avoidant (Peterson, 258). The importance of Attachment Theory is the fact that data shows these attachments, developed in infancy, can stay with an individual throughout the rest of their lives. Avoidant and ambivalent children often grow up to be less sociable than securely attached children. Once these children grow into adulthood, their attachment stops being to their parents or caregivers and are replaced by romantic partners (Peterson, 50). It is common that someone who grew up being avoidant or ambivalent may find it hard to express their basic emotional needs to another individual. It is also common that marital problems can come down to a lack of positive communication. Being critical, defensive or stonewalling, which is often the case with people unable to express themselves, can absolutely effect a marriage negatively (Stack, Eshleman, 528). If a married couple find they are struggling through their marriage, it could be possible that one or both of them were not securely attached in infancy. This is where Emotionally-Focused Therapy can aid significantly to a couple. With around 40% of children growing up either avoidant or ambivalently attached, it is not surprising that divorce rates are as high as they are (Peterson, 260). In addition, with standard couples therapy not being as successful as one would hope, Emotionally-Focused Therapy is a refreshing, and supported way to get the help many couples may need. Peterson defines EFT as, â€Å"An approach for troubled couples based on attachment theory that  directly teaches a more-flexible approach to the expression and satisfaction of needs† (Peterson, 272). The goal of this technique is to be able to send and receive accurate affective messages with their partner which helps each of them achieve the comfort and connection they desire. This therapy is separated into 3 stages, with different sets of therapeutic goals for each. The first stage of EFT is called Cycle De-Escalation (Greenman, Johnson, 47) . This is where the couple can identify the main difficulties in their marriage and begin to understand their problem-cycle. This can often include loneliness, dejection or the fear that that can be associated with not being close and connected to their spouse. This is often when attachment styles are most notable. The second stage involves two main ideas being, Withdrawer Re-engagement and Blamer Softening (Greenman, Johnson, 47). This is a very important stage because it involves restructuring the way the couple interact with each other. The therapist will use many different methods including reflections, enactments, and empathetic restatements to guide the conversation. It is also important in this stage that the individuals turn to one another and portray their true affect. The therapist will help to teach them to control their body language, facial expressions, and tone of voice when speaking to each other. After stage two, the couple should be able to provide and ask for comfort from their partner, coming from a place of vulnerability (Greenman, Johnson, 47). In the third stage the therapist will act as a facilitator. The couple will be redirected and asked about major longstanding conflicts they had. They can then incorporate their new way of interacting with each other into their problem cycle, successfully minimizing it (Greenman, Johnson, 48). This form of therapy is important in showing individuals, who may not have ever expressed themselves thoroughly, that it is okay to recognize their need for emotional closeness. It is also important that they are aware of their avoidance toward speaking vulnerably. Once individuals can obtain a safe haven in their relationship and participate in problem solving effectively, most couples have reported a significantly higher satisfaction with themselves and in their marriage (Greenman, Johnson, 50). When learning about Attachment Theory, some may find themselves in the avoidant or ambivalent categories. This can be daunting, due to the fact that these attachments stay with us throughout our lives. It is discouraging to look into the future and assume you will still not be able to express yourself to your loved ones, and all of this because we did not become securely attached in infancy? This hardly seems fair. Emotionally-Focused Therapy gives an opportunity to those, who perhaps have never been in a secure relationship, to express themselves securely. It allows them the opportunity to build on their relationships in a healthy, productive way. Also allowing them the weight lifting feeling of being vulnerable, heard, and responded to with positivity. Work Cited: Greenman, P., & Johnson, S. (2013). Process Research on Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) for Couples: Linking Theory to Practice. Family Process, 52, 46-61. Retrieved November 29, 2014, from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.dml.regis.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=552d7eaa-fd7a-47e1-85e2-1e0eeb60ec88@sessionmgr115&vid=3&hid=110 Marriage and Divorce. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2014, from http://www.apa.org/topics/divorce/ Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stack, S., & Eshleman, R. (1998). Marital Status and Happiness: A 17-Nation Study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 527-538. (Stack, Eshleman, 527)

Montar Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, and Examples

The Spanish verb montar is a regular -ar  verb like cenar, ayudar, or bajar.  It has several different meanings, but the most common is to mount. This article includes the conjugations of  montar  in the indicative mood (present, preterite, imperfect, future and conditional), the subjunctive mood (present and past), imperative mood, and other verb forms such as the gerund and past participle. Meanings and Examples of the Verb Montar The verb montar  is a cognate of the English verb to mount, so it can mean to mount or to put on. For example, Voy a montar el televisor en la pared is translated as I am going to mount the television on the wall, and  Ellos van a montar una obra de teatro  means They are going to put on a play.   Another meaning of  montar is to ride a horse or a bicycle. For example, A ella le gusta montar a caballo  (She likes to ride horses) or  A à ©l le gusta montar en bicicleta  (He likes to ride bicycles).   Yet another meaning of the verb  montar  is to put together or to assemble. For example,  Tengo que montar los muebles que comprà © en Ikea  (I have to assemble the furniture I bought at Ikea.) This meaning can even be used for putting together or starting a business. For example,  Vamos a montar un negocio de vender frutas  (We are going to start a business selling fruit.) The verb  montar  can also be used as a reflexive verb,  montarse,  in which case it means to get on something or to climb into something. For example, you can talk about  montarse en el bus  (get on the bus),  montarse en el carro  (get in the car),  montarse en el avià ³n  (get on the plane),  montarse en el caballo  (get on the horse), etc. Montar Present Indicative Yo monto I mount Yo monto mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo. T montas You mount T montas a caballo en la finca. Usted/l/ella monta You/he/she mounts Ella monta el cuadro en la pared. Nosotros montamos We mount Nosotros montamos una obra de teatro. Vosotros montis You mount Vosotros montis los muebles rpidamente. Ustedes/ellos/ellas montan You/they mount Ellos montan una tienda de zapatos. Montar Preterite  Indicative The preterite tense can be translated as the English simple past. It is used when talking about actions in the past that have been completed. Yo mont I mounted Yo mont mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo. T montaste You mounted T montaste a caballo en la finca. Usted/l/ella mont You/he/she mounted Ella mont el cuadro en la pared. Nosotros montamos We mounted Nosotros montamos una obra de teatro. Vosotros montasteis You mounted Vosotros montasteis los muebles rpidamente. Ustedes/ellos/ellas montaron You/they mounted Ellos montaron una tienda de zapatos. Montar Imperfect  Indicative The  imperfect  tense can be translated to English as was mounting or used to mount.  It is used to talk about ongoing or repeated actions in the past. Yo montaba I used to mount Yo montaba mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo. T montabas You used to mount T montabas a caballo en la finca. Usted/l/ella montaba You/he/she used to mount Ella montaba el cuadro en la pared. Nosotros montbamos We used to mount Nosotros montbamos una obra de teatro. Vosotros montabais You used to mount Vosotros montabais los muebles rpidamente. Ustedes/ellos/ellas montaban You/they used to mount Ellos montaban una tienda de zapatos. Montar Future  Indicative Yo montar I will mount Yo montar mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo. T montars You will mount T montars a caballo en la finca. Usted/l/ella montar You/he/she will mount Ella montar el cuadro en la pared. Nosotros montaremos We will mount Nosotros montaremos una obra de teatro. Vosotros montaris You will mount Vosotros montaris los muebles rpidamente. Ustedes/ellos/ellas montarn You/they will mount Ellos montarn una tienda de zapatos. Montar Periphrastic Future  Indicative Yo voy a montar I am going to mount Yo voy a montar mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo. T vas a montar You are going to mount T vas a montar a caballo en la finca. Usted/l/ella va a montar You/he/she is going to mount Ella va a montar el cuadro en la pared. Nosotros vamos a montar We are going to mount Nosotros vamos a montar una obra de teatro. Vosotros vais a montar You are going to mount Vosotros vais a montar los muebles rpidamente. Ustedes/ellos/ellas van a montar You/they are going to mount Ellos van a montar una tienda de zapatos. Montar Conditional  Indicative The conditional  tense can be translated to English as would mount.  It is used to talk about possibilities. Yo montara I would mount Yo montara mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo si viviera ms cerca. T montaras You would mount T montaras a caballo en la finca si estuvieras ms saludable. Usted/l/ella montara You/he/she would mount Ella montara el cuadro en la pared si tuviera las herramientas necesarias. Nosotros montaramos We would mount Nosotros montaramos una obra de teatro, pero no tenemos tiempo para ensayar. Vosotros montarais You would mount Vosotros montarais los muebles rpidamente, pero son muy grandes. Ustedes/ellos/ellas montaran You/they would mount Ellos montaran una tienda de zapatos si tuvieran el dinero para empezar. Montar Present Progressive/Gerund Form The present participle or gerund  for -ar  verbs is formed with the ending  -ando. The present participle is used in  progressive tenses  like the present progressive. Present Progressive of Montar està ¡ montando Is mounting Ella està ¡ montando el cuadro en la pared. Montar Past Participle The past participle for -ar  verbs is formed with the ending  -ado. The past participle is used in  compound tenses  like the present perfect.   Present Perfect of Montar ha montado  Has mounted Ella ha montado el cuadro en la pared.   Montar Present Subjunctive Que yo monte That I mount El mdico sugiere que yo monte mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo. Que t montes That you mount El jefe quiere que t montes a caballo en la finca. Que usted/l/ella monte That you/he/she mount Mam quiere que ella monte el cuadro en la pared. Que nosotros montemos That we mount El director quiere que nosotros montemos una obra de teatro. Que vosotros montis That you mount El cliente quiere que vosotros montis los muebles rpidamente. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas monten That you/they mount Pedro sugiere que ellos monten una tienda de zapatos. Montar Imperfect  Subjunctive There are two different ways of conjugating the  imperfect subjunctive. The tables below show both options, which are equally correct. Option 1 Que yo montara That I mounted El mdico sugiri que yo montara mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo. Que t montaras That you mounted El jefe quera que t montaras a caballo en la finca. Que usted/l/ella montara That you/he/she mounted Mam quera que ella montara el cuadro en la pared. Que nosotros montramos That we mounted El director quera que nosotros montramos una obra de teatro. Que vosotros montarais That you mounted El cliente quera que vosotros montarais los muebles rpidamente. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas montaran That you/they mounted Pedro sugiri que ellos montaran una tienda de zapatos. Option 2 Que yo montase That I mounted El mdico sugiri que yo montase mi bicicleta para ir al trabajo. Que t montases That you mounted El jefe quera que t montases a caballo en la finca. Que usted/l/ella montase That you/he/she mounted La mam quera que ella montase el cuadro en la pared. Que nosotros montsemos That we mounted El director quera que nosotros montsemos una obra de teatro. Que vosotros montaseis That you mounted El cliente quera que vosotros montaseis los muebles rpidamente. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas montasen That you/they mounted Pedro sugiri que ellos montasen una tienda de zapatos. Montar Imperative   The imperative mood is used to give direct orders. The tables below show the positive and negative commands for  montar. Positive Commands T monta Mount! Monta a caballo en la finca! Usted monte Mount! Monte el cuadro en la pared! Nosotros montemos Lets mount! Montemos una obra de teatro! Vosotros montad Mount! Montad los muebles rpidamente! Ustedes monten Mount! Monten una tienda de zapatos! Negative Commands T no montes Dont mount! No montes a caballo en la finca! Usted no monte Dont mount No monte el cuadro en la pared! Nosotros no montemos Lets not mount No montemos una obra de teatro! Vosotros no montis Dont mount! No montis los muebles rpidamente! Ustedes no monten Dont mount! No monten una tienda de zapatos!